Thursday, February 10, 2011

Rififi Assignment

I hope you liked Rififi more than you thought you would!

OK. Remember, this assignment is MORE practice for the Presentation assessment next year. Choose a 5 minute scene in Rififi to analyze. There may be clips on YouTube, but you can also come into the library to re-watch scenes.

After you have your 5 minute scene chosen, analyze it completely. Remember that you need to mention why you chose the scene and this scene's relation to the film as a whole. In addition, pay close attention to: mise en scene, lighting, camera angles, shot types, etc. Here is a list of items to pay attention to when you are writing your 750 words (at least) and when you are doing your oral presentation:

  • How well do I understand how meaning is constructed through the use of film language in this extract?
  • How well do I understand the extract’s relationship to the film as a whole?
  • How well do I understand the influences of the film’s genre?
  • How well can I place the film and this extract in a broader socio-cultural context?
  • How insightful is my analysis of the director’s intention?
  • How coherent, incisive, insightful, and detailed is my evaluative interpretation of this contract?

Here is a list of "vocab" you can use:
narrative
direction
cinematography
mise-en-scene
lighting (which is often, but not always, considered part of mise-en-scene)
camera movement
editing
sound (diagetic and non-diagetic)

Be sure your paper is AT LEAST 750 words. Let your ideas flow. Don't keep counting words and they will come. I promise you. As you start talking about what you see and hear in the film, you won't want to stop!

Please see me/email me with questions if needed.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Blog Response #10

Having read Eisenstein's, Pudovkin's, and Alexandrov's Statement on Sound, and using an example of a film we have screened in class, agree or disagree with the following, in 2-3 well-developed paragraphs:

We who work in the USSR recognise that, given our technical capabilities, the practical implementation of sound cinema is not feasible in the near future. At the same time we consider it opportune to make a statement on a number of prerequisite theoretical principles, particularly as according to reports reaching us, attempts are being made to use this new improvement in cinema for the wrong purposes. In addition, an incorrect understanding of the potential of the new technical invention might not only hinder the development and improvement of cinema as an art form but might also threaten to destroy all its formal achievements to date.

If you choose to use a sound film to disagree with the statement, your essay will be stronger if you include an example from a silent film we've viewed (or one you've viewed on your own). Vice versa, if you choose to agree with the statement and use a silent film as your choice, be sure to include examples from a sound film to make your point.

If you have any questions, please see me.

Due: Friday, February 4, 2011.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Article in today's NY Times...

There's a really good article in today's paper about Fritz Lang, director of M.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Blood Simple

In case you are interested in reading the script for Blood Simple, it can be found here.

Roger Ebert's essay on the 15th anniversary of the film can be found here.

Ebert's original review of Blood Simple is here.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Blog Post #9--Film Noir

Having read Paul Schrader's Notes on Film Noir, please discuss Double Indemnity and your choice of another film noir that Schrader talks about. Discuss, in at least 3-4 well-developed paragraphs, the films' implicit meanings and how the directors portray these meanings cinematically. Be sure to use lots of visual examples (camera angles, shots, movement, editing, sequencing, lighting, mise en scene, etc.). Look at representation of the characters and issues. Ask yourself, Why? For example, Why did the director choose to light a scene a certain way?

In order to make this a manageable task, choose a 5-minute scene from each film and focus on that scene and how it relates to the film as a whole.

Remember, these exercises are preparing you for the Presentation assessment.

Be sure to read Schrader's essay and tie in some of what he says into your essay.

I'm looking forward to reading your essays. (Really, I am!)

Sunday, December 12, 2010